Once again it is time for political ads to dominate the media. The politicians do such a great job of bashing each other that neither is worthy of a vote. Frankly, I had voted for Micky Mouse more times than I can remember in the last several elections. The vote I cast for a ridiculous, fictional character was my way of rebelling against the system. After all, I didn't want to be guilty of not voting, as if it matters. Now I leave my vote open if I don't like the choices handed to me. I was recently surprised to discover that they pay more attention to votes left blank, it is referred to as an "undervote'" It is estimated that in the last election up to 21% of ballots in some districts were undervoted. That tells me people are starting to agree that our choices are not acceptable.
In California we are faced with the choice of voting for Barbara Boxer, the incombent for Senator and Carly Fiorino the former CEO that ran Hewlett Packard into the ground. Oh how to choose? Barbara Boxer has been at the Capitol for twenty years all the while the great Military Industrial Complex has expanded, the rich have gotten richer and the poor have gotten poorer. And then there is Carly Fiorino who thought it a brilliant idea to merge HP with Compaq (one of the worst computer I have ever used) and lowered HP's quality until it became unusable, in my opinion.
For governor our choices are not much better, Jerry Brown or meg Whitman. I have met him three times and Jerry is a very nice man with a good heart and sincere intentions. However he has never been able to produce the results he has promised. I doubt he has the moxy or charisma to make any real change. Then there is Meg.....a billionaire who had spent 190 million of her own wealth to win the campaign. I've always wondered why someone would spend so much money for a position that pays little in comparison. She believes that welfare is bringing the State down all the while squirreling away a billions dollars on a CEO's salary. Maybe she just can't see the grossly unfair distribution of wealth through her piles of money.
The problem is with a two party system. If anyone has ever been to a Democratic committee meeting they know that the committees are mostly comprised of legislative aides, union leaders and a few old ladies. They make the decision regarding who your choice for democrat will be. On the other hand the GOP meets more discreetly. A lot of yuppy college kids get together and chant the benefits of a free market while the real decision regarding your choice for republican is made behind the desks of a few CEOs. The point is that real people, hard working, everyday people, have no choice about the two options thrown to them on the ballot. It reminds of a movie I watched recently about Ralph Nader An Unreasonable Man . I was under the impression that he was bit nuts. I'm not so sure anymore. He spoiled Al Gore's chances in 2000, didn't he. It turns out no. The hassles that the Democratic Party and the GOP gave him were beyond reasonable. Nader was trying to offer another option and they were not having it. I mean really, why aren't more parties allowed to participate in National debates? I know there are usually people on the ballot from various parties but their voices are so stifled that we don't know who they are and, therefore, they have no chance of winng. It is clear that the establishment is hell bent on keeping our choices to two candidates. So I will respond by keeping my ballot blank.
Love, Constance
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment